The United Nations is planning to adopt a digital pact between member states at the “Summit of the Future” in New York next week as part of the globalist roll out of digital ID and central bank digital currencies.

The dystopian UN pact aims to promote digitization, mandate the use of digital devices, and digital ID, and implement plans for the roll out of the technology.

Critics of the UN plans claim there has been a lack of public consultation and parliamentary involvement in the negotiations of this pact. 

If you disregard the fluffy language with which the Global Digital Compact is packed, you can see an agreement to force all people into a world controlled by digital corporations and technology developed by leading globalists including Bill Gates.

The Global Digital Compact in the 2nd revision and the 3rd revision versions have been released on the UN’s Summit of the Future webpage.

However, the UN and member state governments involved in the preparation of the summit have made no effort to inform the public about the plan, or even to have it discussed in parliaments and the media.

Instead, the compact will be discussed for the first time at a forum attended by The World Economic Forum and the Club of Rome, as reported – organizations which are opaque, undemocratic and do not have our best interests at heart.

The text of the treaty, we learn by way of the introduction, states that digital technologies “offer immense potential benefits for human welfare and the progress of societies,“ and that we, therefore, have to eliminate any digital divide between countries and within countries.

The declared goal is “a digital future for everyone.“

Norbert Haering explains why the elite are not discussing the terms of the compact with the public. They are simply not interested in giving us any say in the matter:

What is important is what is not in the contract. The word voluntary only occurs in connection with the signing of the contract. However, there is no right for citizens to choose a future other than the fully digitised one for themselves. Because that would open up a digital divide that should no longer exist. There is no right to regulate many of his/her affairs in a traditional way in dealing with other people instead of computers. Nobody should be allowed to choose that their children are taught by teachers instead of computers, or that conversations with the doctor and treatments remain a secret instead of being packed on the servers of the IT groups. Nothing in the contract suggests that such a right has been considered at all.

The elite are determined to build a digital prison planet of which there will be no escaping.

TRENDING: WEF Unveil Tech To Forcefully Rewire “Dangerous” Conspiracy Theorist’s Brains

The General Manager of the Bank of International Settlements, known as the “Central Bank of Central Banks,” described the elites’ vision of a financial surveillance state and cashless society in picture perfect detail.

According to Augustin Carstens, central banks will soon have “absolute control” of everyone’s money and the “technology to enforce that.”

The video in which Carstens issues the threat has gone viral after announcements by the Biden Administration and other governments regarding the development of Central Bank Digital Currencies.

Known as CBDCs for short, the currencies are federally-issued but take the form of crypto, and are being promoted as a means to usher in a cashless society.

By banning cash and using CBDCs, Carstens boasts, governments and their financial oligarchs will not only be able to track purchases globally and see exactly who’s buying what, but they’ll also be able to fulfill their longtime goal of having “absolute control” over financial transactions.

“We don’t know who’s using a $100 bill today and we don’t know who’s using a 1,000 peso bill today,” the globalist banker said, bemoaning the anonymity of cash.

“The key difference with the CBDC is the central bank will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability,” Carstens said.

“And also we will have the technology to enforce that,” he added.