This article was originally published on WLT Report. You can read the original article HERE
How would you feel if your 6 year old kid came home from school and you find out the school gave them the shot?
Without your approval?
Would you feel upset?
Infuriated?
Well, the Supreme Court in Vermont says that’s your problem. And that the schools are protected under a PREP Act.
They want that Pfizer cash and they don’t want any pesky parents getting in their way.
I have a feeling they are going to regret this greatly.
🚨 “A school that injected a minor with a COVID-19 vaccine despite the boy’s parents telling school officials they did not want him to receive a COVID-19 vaccine is immune under federal law, the Vermont Supreme Court has ruled. pic.twitter.com/wgMtEaygmj
— Jabbar J D (@JabbarJD1) August 8, 2024
It’s time to seriously consider Home Schooling your Children!
Schools have been given the green light to vaccinate children with Covid-19 mRNA shots without parental consent by the Vermont Supreme Court which ruled that schools are protected under the PREP Act which provides… pic.twitter.com/JT5yiEHEoZ
— “Sudden And Unexpected” (@toobaffled) July 31, 2024
NBC News reports:
BRATTLEBORO, Vt. (CITC) — The Vermont Supreme Court ruled Friday a family cannot sue their child’s school district after the then-6-year-old was given a COVID-19 vaccine without their consent.
The child, labeled L.P. in the original complaint, was vaccinated at a November 2021 clinic hosted by the Windham Southeast School District and the Vermont Department of Health. L.P. was a student at the district’s Academy School at the time.
L.P.’s father told a school official days prior to the clinic the child was not to be vaccinated, court documents say. The school official acknowledged the father’s directive, according to Friday’s ruling.
Clinic workers gave L.P. one dose of the Pfizer vaccine after the child was mistakenly given a name tag reading the name of another student, according to the ruling. The second student had allegedly already received a vaccination earlier that day.
L.P. ‘verbally protested,’ saying, ‘Dad said no,'” the ruling reads.
Academy School officials eventually realized the error and called L.P.’s parents to apologize, who later removed their child from the school, according to the ruling.
The Vermont Supreme Court ruled Friday state and school officials involved in the matter are protected under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, which provides liability immunity.
Friendly reminder, these teachers are STILL wearing the masks.
It’s beyond time to homeschool!
😎😎😎😎😎
Masking after teaching a class ✊️😷✊️😷 pic.twitter.com/AGiaHYqcHp
— Dr Blair Williams🏳️🌈♀️ (@BlairWilliams26) August 28, 2024
This article was originally published by WLT Report. We only curate news from sources that align with the core values of our intended conservative audience. If you like the news you read here we encourage you to utilize the original sources for even more great news and opinions you can trust!
Comments