---

Over the past few months, the World Health Organisation (“WHO”), GAVI, the International Development Association (“IDA”) and the Pandemic Fund have revealed how much money they’ll need in the next few years.

WHO wants to raise $11.1 billion, GAVI wants donors to cough up $11.9 billion, IDA wants to raise $100 billion and the Pandemic Fund wants $2 billion.

Where do they expect this money to come from?

According to Devex, while rhetorically several donors have voiced their support for WHO, GAVI, IDA and the Pandemic Fund’s work, with some already announcing funding pledges ahead of the official replenishment and investment events, others have yet to show their hand – meaning it’s unclear if and how much they will be giving.

The United States is the largest donor to global health. During its last replenishment, the US was the top donor to IDA.  The US was also the top contributor to WHO. And so far, it’s leading the charge for the replenishments of both the Pandemic Fund and GAVI, pledging $667 million and $1.58 billion to the two, respectively.

Read more: Deep dive: The crowded field for global health fundraising, Devex, 8 August 2024

As we have seen during the covid era, the same names crop up among private funders such as the Rockefeller Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust.

The Rockefeller and Gates Foundations are linked.  As Wikispooks noted in 2020: “People with close connections to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Microsoft (Patty Stonesifer, Rajiv Shah) have senior positions in the Rockefeller Foundation, making the two giant foundations noticeably interwoven (or strategically infiltrated by Gates).”

Aside from private funders, the global pandemic and vaccine schemes and organisations are being funded by national governments – the money you pay in taxes is going to these organisations – with little transparency and no oversight.  As Gates is significantly involved in all these schemes it is highly possible that the money Gates is moving from one scheme to another is not his own but originates from contributions made by national governments from the taxes we pay.

It is time to demand that our governments prove to us how the money they are handing over to these supranational organisations is used and let them know that we do not want our money handed to such organisations without our explicit permission.

Further reading:

The Pandemic Fund

The Pandemic Fund, established in September 2022, is a World Bank partnership with a consortium of donor countries, potential implementing country governments, foundations and civil society organisations. WHO is its technical lead.

The Fund finances investments to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response at national, regional and global levels and allocated its first grants to support countries in strengthening disease surveillance and early warning, laboratory systems and health workforce.

According to its website:

The Pandemic Fund’s founding financial contributors are Australia, Canada, China, European Commission, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, Spain, United Arab Emirates, United States, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Wellcome Trust.

The founding donors, joined by Austria, Denmark, France, India, Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, have committed over US$1.6 billion in financial contributions to date. The Pandemic Fund will continue to raise funds for its work. [Emphasis added]

The Fund wants to raise $2 billion for the implementation of its new five-year, medium-term strategic plan, which will see a large part of its resources go to countries with the largest gaps in pandemic prevention, preparedness and response capacity. It will also be crucial for the fund to continue its work, as it anticipates that it will have “exhausted” the bulk of its resources by June 2025.

The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria

The Global Fund was launched by the United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan in 2002,  It is a public-private partnership and is a financing mechanism rather than an implementing agency. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation provided the seed money for the Fund. Since then, public sector contributions have constituted 95 per cent of all financing raised; the remaining 5 per cent comes from the private sector.

In 2011, AFP reported: “Revelations that 34 million euros (25 million dollars) have gone missing from community programmes in four African nations have prompted Sweden and Germany to suspend donations [to the Global Fund] until an audit is completed this year.”

The Global Fund raises funding in three-year cycles known as Replenishments. The current period, the Seventh Replenishment, covers 2023-2025. For this Replenishment, it “has only raised $15.7 billion in pledges,” Devex said.

Of the $15.7 billion pledged, $14.4 billion is from countries and $1.3 billion is from the private sector and non-governmental organisations.  You can find a link to download an Excel workbook of the ‘Pledges and Contributions Report’ HERE.

The top country donors include France which has pledged $1.6 billion and Germany $1.3 billion, in addition to $710 million pledged by the European Commission. Japan has pledged $1.1 billion and the US $6 billion.  The top donor from the private sector is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation which has pledged $927 million for the years 2023-2025.

China has not pledged anything for 2023-2025.  Interestingly, for the previous period covering 2020-2022, China’s commitments were personally secured by Bill Gates and Bono.

The Fund’s website boasts that it “invests more than US$5 billion a year to defeat HIV, TB and malaria.” It collaborates with other global health organisations, such as WHO, the United Nations Children’s Fund (“UNICEF”), and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (“UNAIDS”).

Whenever we see the involvement of United Nations (“UN”) agencies, we should bear in mind the UN’s ties to the Rockefeller Foundation.  The Rockefeller family has had a long-standing relationship with the UN, dating back to its inception.  After World War II, John D. Rockefeller, Jr. donated land for the UN headquarters. Technically, the UN headquarters complex in New York remains an extraterritorial site that remains beyond the jurisdictional reach of the surrounding city and state as well as the US federal government.

The Rockefeller Foundation also played an important role in the transition from the League of Nations (“LoN”) to the UN.

The Rockefeller Foundation [RF] played an important role in the transition from the League of Nations to the United Nations through its collaboration with two international organisations.

The first was the Economic, Financial and Transit Department (EFTD) of the LoN. By financing its move to the United States and all of its work during the Second World War, the RF would allow it to make a major contribution to the reorganisation of the global economic order after 1945.

The second organisation was the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA), which the RF provided with staff, working methods, and a network of contacts around the world. The RF was thus deeply involved in the redefinition of the overall structure of the system of international organisations during WWII.

Tournès, L. (2014). The Rockefeller Foundation and the Transition from the League of Nations to the UN (1939–1946). Journal of Modern European History, 12(3), 323-341. https://doi.org/10.17104/1611-8944_2014_3_323 University of Geneva

World Health Organisation

WHO is a specialised agency of the UN.  The Rockefeller Foundation-WHO collaboration goes back to the beginnings of the World Health Organisation.

“The [Rockefeller] Foundation participated as an observer at the first International Health Conference in June 1946, where WHO’s constitution was signed and the Organisation became the first specialised agency of the United Nations,” WHO’s website states.

In January 2022, the Rockefeller Foundation was admitted as a non-state with WHO. Non-state actors in official relations participate in sessions of WHO’s governing bodies. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is also one of WHO’s non-State actors.  However, the Rockefeller Foundation and the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (“OCHA”) are the only non-governmental organisations listed alongside countries on WHO’s ‘Partnering for a Healthier World’ webpage, a list of WHO’s partners in global health.

WHO are years behind in publishing its audited financial reports which, if published, would reassure the public, to some extent, that the money they are given is being spent as the organisation claims.  The most recent audited financial statements published relate to the year ended December 2021. For 2021,  the combined contributions of GAVI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation made Gates the second-largest funder of WHO.

It’s not only the Rockefellers and Gates who influence WHO.  Sir Jeremy Farrar who has served as WHO’s chief scientist since 2023 was previously the chair of the Wellcome Trust.

WHO, which launched its first investment round for this year in May at the 77th World Health Assembly, will be holding a fundraising event in November. It was at the 77th World Health Assembly that WHO had been planning to enact a global coup through its amendments to International Health Regulations and a Pandemic Treaty. 

WHO is now asking for $11.1 billion to fund its work over the next four years. “It expects the world’s countries will pay $4 billion in membership dues, leaving $7.1 billion for it to fundraise from governments and the private sector,” Devex wrote.

Why would anyone give any more money to an organisation that is not known for its transparency, is headed by a terrorist and is yet to prove where the money they were previously given has gone?

Additionally, the WHO Foundation – which was launched in 2020 to expand the agency’s donor base and reap money from philanthropic organisations, companies, corporate foundations and the general public – aims to raise $50 million for the investment round.

Professor Thomas Zeltner is the founder and chair of the WHO Foundation which has been set up to support the work of WHO. He has a long history of collaboration with WHO. He is a former Secretary of Health of Switzerland and Director-General of the Swiss National Health Authority.  From March 2020 to October 2022, he was the co-chair of the Task Force Covid-19 Vaccination in Switzerland.  He is currently President of the Swiss Red Cross and Chairman of the Swiss Red Cross Council. He is also Deputy Chair of the University Council of the Medical University of Vienna, President of the UNESCO Commission of Switzerland and advises the Swiss Federal Government in the implementation and future development of the National Health Policy.

GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance

GAVI is a public-private global health partnership founded in 2000 by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation “and partners.” WHO is one of four permanent members of the GAVI Board. The other three permanent members are the World Bank, UNICEF (vice chair) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.  These four organisations are also stated as GAVI’s core partners.

Gavi’s impact draws on the strengths of its core partners, the World Health Organization, UNICEF, the World Bank and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation …

Gavi now vaccinates more than half of the world’s children, giving it tremendous power to negotiate vaccines at prices that are affordable for the poorest countries and to remove the commercial risks that previously kept manufacturers from serving them.

About Our Alliance, GAVI

In other words, GAVI is creating a global vaccine monopoly.  GAVI is not a charity; it is not giving vaccines away it is selling them.  To pay for its expenses it will be selling vaccines above cost.  How much it sells vaccines for above cost and who benefits from the profits are topics that are never publicly discussed or scrutinised.  We are simply expected to believe the claim that GAVI is a not-for-profit organisation even though in 2023 it spent $33 million on fundraising activities, $44 million on its management expenses and $3.6 billion on what it calls “programme expenses.”

For the period 2021-2025, total contributions and pledges to GAVI, so far, are $21.6 billion, averaging $4.3 billion for five years.  For comparison, its latest financial statements show it received 394 million in 2023 and $450 million in 2022 from contributions and donations.  Either the pledges never materialise or GAVI is planning to dramatically increase its global vaccine trade in the coming years.

For the period 2021-2025, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the fourth largest funder and largest private funder contributing $1.8 billion.

GAVI launched its replenishment campaign in June. It’s asking for $9 billion in new pledges, out of a total need of $11.9 billion to fund the organisation’s work from 2026 to 2030.

The organisation aims to vaccinate 500 million children in the next five years, including 50 million children with a malaria vaccine, GMA News Online reported.

Related: Paediatrician is alarmed at Bill Gates’ plan to inject 500 million children with harmful and unnecessary vaccines

International Development Association

IDA, the World Bank’s fund for low-income countries, hopes to raise $100 billion through a new cycle of funding. IDA has historically been funded largely by contributions from the governments of its member countries from which it gives grants and provides loans.

On its ‘Replenishment’ webpage, IDA states: “About a third of IDA countries are facing a looming food crisis.”  The next sentence reads: “To help countries build back greener, a substantial portion of these funds go to tackling climate change.”  The funds it is referring to were $93 billion raised in December 2021 for fiscal years 2022-2025 (IDA20).

For the current fundraising for $100 billion (IDA21), IDA has identified the following areas that are “crucial” to ending poverty:

As is obvious from the image above, the money IDA raises will be spent on pushing the global agenda under the auspices of alleviating poverty.  Its Proposed Strategic Directions for this latest funding round states:

… IDA21 will seek to enhance protection for the poorest and most vulnerable populations, while investing in human capital for healthy, skilled, and inclusive societies in IDA countries. Concurrently, IDA21 will work towards a liveable planet by helping IDA countries invest in climate adaptation and mitigation, biodiversity and nature, crisis preparedness and access to life essentials, such as food and water. It will prioritise strengthening resilience among the poorest and most vulnerable, enabling them to prepare for, adapt to, and respond to shocks. IDA21 will also emphasise effective macroeconomic and fiscal management, underpinned by fiscal and debt policy reforms aimed at expanding the fiscal space for development spending, while supporting IDA countries to strengthen institutional capacity and enhance private investments. Moreover, IDA21 will support efforts in improving infrastructure and services, enhancing access to water and electricity, increasing renewable energy capacity, and strengthening digital connectivity and services. [Emphasis added]

International Development Association 21st Replenishment: Proposed Strategic Directions, IDA World Bank, 17 May 2024, pg. 4

While we don’t yet know the pledges for the 21st replenishment (IDA21), the previous replenishment, IDA20, raised $16.5 billion.  The top funders were Japan ($.4 billion), Germany ($1.4 billion), France ($1.2 billion), the United Kingdom ($1.3 billion) and the United States ($2.4 billion).

Apart from Bill Gates – who is a common denominator in all these schemes and could, at least in part, be profiting from moving countries’ contributions from one fund to another – we are the ones funding all these nefarious Globalist schemes from the taxes we pay to our governments.  And the money required to feed the ever-growing appetite of these schemes seems to be increasing exponentially.