Students for Life Action (SFLAction) released new and appalling undercover video footage of infamous, late-term abortionist Dr. Curtis Boyd at a recent Washington, D.C. book signing of  his book, “We Choose To,” along with his abortionist wife, Dr. Glenna Halvorson-Boyd. SFLAction staff members attended the event, capturing several exchanges on undercover video, showing that lack of concern for women’s survival or the fate of a viable baby would not deter the abortionists from supporting a sale.

In the video, SFLAction’s Savanna Deretich asked Boyd if he could help a fictional “friend” who was eight months pregnant get an abortion. The abortionist and his wife immediately began problem-solving to connect Deretich with an abortion – no questions asked. Late-term abortions are real.

REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.

WATCH THE FULL VIDEO HERE.

“The reckless disregard for preborn human life is at the core of the abortion industry – and despite the media and Democrats’ continued lies that late-term abortions do not happen, Students for Life Action has yet again found proof that it does,” said SFLAction President Kristan Hawkins. “This is what Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz are fighting for: an abortion any place, any time, for anyone. In fact, if elected, a Harris-Walz administration would attack the filibuster to make it easier to pass an abortion law even more radical than Roe, guaranteeing a national right to late-term abortion until the moment of birth.”

“During the entire conversation, I felt sick,” said Deretich, who recorded the first video. “So many lives have been cruelly taken because of this Bonnie and Clyde abortion duo, dedicated to offering death to women’s children under the guise of ‘loving care.’ These married doctors have taken more life than they have created and physically and mentally scarred countless women.”

READ THE FULL RECAP OF SAVANNA’S EXPERIENCES UNDERCOVER HERE.

During the event, another staff member asked Boyd about two policy changes that the National Abortion Federation supports when it comes to Chemical Abortion Pill policy.

Boyd and his wife have been pivotal members of the National Abortion Federation (NAF), which pretends to provide a professional structure for abortion vendors. They claim: “As the professional organization of abortion providers in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and Colombia, NAF provides clinical standards and guidelines that can be used at any abortion-providing facility.”

“Standards” for the number one means of abortion in America, Chemical Abortion Pills are included in the NAF 2024 “Guidelines.”

Zach Sprouse also attended the event for SFLA, reporting that the smiling faces in the room were a shock. In an undercover video, you can hear a woman say “don’t answer that” when Sprouse asked pointed questions about the risks of Chemical Abortion Pills.

“I looked across the room and saw smiles on everyone’s faces as he described his experience, committing an abortion on a 16-year-old girl in the 70s when this was still an illegal practice. He talked about how he changed her life. He was proud of his profession and admitted to enjoying what he does,” Sprouse said with shock.

But even more shocking was how Boyd seemed surprised to be asked a pointed policy question – about the policy group positions he champions.

“When I asked my question about why they did not require an ultrasound for a chemical abortion and the risk of ectopic pregnancies, he stated that we no longer require ultrasounds to identify ectopic pregnancies. Therefore, it is unnecessary, and they can discover the ectopic pregnancies in other ways,” Sprouse noted.

“When asked about why Rh-negative women are not administered RhoGAM shots after chemical abortions to prevent the risk of future infertility, he said that it is no longer an issue and that women are not at risk of infertility in this scenario,” Sprouse said.

Both answers are demonstrably false.

WATCH THAT VIDEO HERE:

NAF 2024 standards state: “For most patients, testing before a medication abortion, including ultrasound, is not required. People can safely manage early medication abortion on their own.” Emphasis added.

Hawkins said, “Not required is not the same thing as not needed. One is a matter of the law and regulation, profoundly broken for Chemical Abortion Pills and another is a matter of best medical practices, clearly unimportant to those who kill small people for a living. Remember that about 2% of Americans have a peanut allergy and about 2% of women will experience an ectopic pregnancy. We’ve rightly turned our society upside down to protect people from potentially deadly allergies while pretending it is no big deal to risk women’s lives with Chemical Abortion Pills.”

Ingrid Skop, M.D., FACOG, Vice President and Director of Medical Affairs for Charlotte Lozier Institute, found the abortionist’s statements that in an ideal world, women WOULD be seen in person to be very significant considering all the risks of Chemical Abortion Pills.

Dr. Skop observed: “The abortion industry’s cavalier actions in removing recommendations for ultrasound and Rh testing/RhoGAM provision prior to first trimester medication abortion provision, based on very little evidence, demonstrates conclusively that they are willing to risk the lives and future fertility of women in their goal of readily accessible self-managed abortion.

“The stakes are high-ruptured ectopic pregnancy is the leading cause of maternal death in the first trimester, and Rh isoimmunization can lead to severe complications for future children, including brain damage and death. Injured women and children are the collateral damage those who promote abortion are willing to accept in pursuit of their ideologic goals.”

READ MORE: Peanut Allergies and Abortion Pills: Why Ignore Either Risk?

Consider the support for protections among registered Youth voters, illustrated by Pro-Life Generation’s Demetree Institute for Pro-Life Advancement:

More than half of abortions today are through taking abortion-inducing drugs. Two hormone pills, mifepristone (Mifeprex) and misoprostol (Cytotec), are prescribed by a healthcare provider and are then taken by a woman to end a pregnancy. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently allowed for the distribution of these pills through online telehealth sales, allowing for no-test, online distribution of the pills.

ON SUPPORT FOR PRE-SCREENING FOR ECTOPIC PREGNANCY: Ultrasound screenings (a simple imaging technique used to produce images of structures within the body) are used to determine how far along a woman is in pregnancy, as the abortion-inducing drugs can fail if used later in the pregnancy and complications may arise.

Ultrasounds can also be used to determine if a woman has an ectopic pregnancy, which is when the fetus has implanted outside of the uterus/womb. In an ectopic pregnancy, the abortion-inducing drugs will not end the pregnancy, and the woman can have severe complications, including death.

9 in 10 Youth Voters Supported Health and Safety Measures to save the Life of the Mother who may be experiencing an ectopic pregnancy – with 47% saying its “extremely important.”

ON PROTECTING A MOTHER’S FUTURE FERTILITY WITH TREATMENT: A blood test is needed to check a woman’s Rh blood status. Rh-negative blood occurs in 15% of women. If the blood of an Rh-positive fetus gets into the bloodstream of an Rh-negative woman, the woman’s body produces antibodies that could attack the fetus’ blood cells, leading to serious health problems, even death, for a fetus or a newborn. The antibodies also put the mother’s future children at risk while in the womb. Antibodies can be formed after a miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, or an abortion. If Rh-negative blood is detected very early in the pregnancy, a prescription medicine (RhoGAM) can be given to prevent antibodies from forming.

94% supported protecting a woman’s future fertility with a blood test and treatment, with 48% saying it’s extremely important. This is an INCREASE from last year’s poll.

“The National Abortion Federation has one job, and it’s to come up with standards of medical care,” said Hawkins. “Time and time again what is shown is a standard of NO care; an organization that seems perfectly comfortable with the risks of infertility and death that women face.”

INFORMATION ON CHEMICAL ABORTION PILLS AND THEIR RISKS IS AVAILABLE AT: THIS IS CHEMICAL ABORTION.