.

ER Editor: Some tweets on this topic.

Senator Malcolm Roberts’ Alarming Warning on Australia’s Digital ID Bill
In this video, Senator Malcolm Roberts delivers a powerful speech highlighting the dangers and implications of Australia’s new Digital ID Bill. He argues that the bill, while presented as a measure for… pic.twitter.com/IoPoVsgNNm

— Camus (@newstart_2024) May 16, 2024

WE ADVISE READERS TO CHECK OUT THE FULL TEXT OF THIS TWEET —

Australia 🇦🇺 just passed its Digital Identity Bill into law.

I’m Australian, but live in Iceland 🇮🇸: a country that already has an all-encompassing digital ID system. If you’re wondering how Australia’s new system will play out, I’ll tell you here.

And also, how Australians who… pic.twitter.com/6cpYDIiSJJ

— Leon Hill (@iamLeonHill) May 16, 2024

🔥🔥🔥BREAKING 😥😥😥

At 4.50pm this afternoon, and with only token opposition from the Liberals & Nationals the Digital ID Bill was passed by the Parliament.

A sad day for Australia, as the nation marches further down the road towards a totalitarian society.

And never… pic.twitter.com/GjVtIxwK0t

— Craig Kelly (@CraigKellyPHON) May 16, 2024

Digital ID Bill : The sounds of silence from the Liberal Party.

Yesterday was very sad day for Australia in many respects with the passing of the Digital ID Bill.

And one of the saddest was the gutlessness of the Liberal Party and their token opposition.

🚨To have just one… https://t.co/bDBPy2e2SG pic.twitter.com/75MwI0mlGW

— Craig Kelly (@CraigKellyPHON) May 17, 2024

🚨BREAKING: The Digital ID Bill has passed in both houses of Parliament in Australia. Good thing it’ll definitely be “VOLUNTARY” just like the COVID vaccines!pic.twitter.com/V5MLKff0dF

— MilkBarTV (@TheMilkBarTV) May 16, 2024

********

Australia passed its Digital ID Bill in the House of Representatives today, green lighting the implementation of the legislative framework for the expansion of the Australian Government’s Digital ID system.

The bill was passed 87:56, with Labor, the Greens and Teals voting Aye and the Coalition and some Independents voting No. The bill passed in Senate in March of this year.

Controversially, the parliamentary debate over the bill was allocated to the Federation Chamber, a smaller room off the main Chamber of the House which is not as closely monitored by the press, leading some to speculate that this was a move to sideline debate.

The Australian Government says that the expanded Digital ID framework will centralise access to federal, state and territory government services, will streamline and strengthen identity verification for citizens, and will improve accreditation schemes for service providers.

Australian Government figures show that more than 10.5 million Australians have already created an account with the Federal Government’s Digital ID system, myGovID, to access more than 130 government services.

The 2024-2025 federal budget, released this week, provides $288.1 million to boost adoption of the Digital ID system over the next four years. The 11-fold increase in funding, compared to $24.7 million in the previous budget, will fund pilots for adding government-verified credentials to digital wallets.

State and territory governments services will tie in with the federal Digital ID framework. The West Australian Government recently relaunched its ServiceWA app with a cash bonus scheme for families, encouraging recipients to obtain a Digital ID for instant online payment.

The Digital ID bill stipulates that creation and use of Digital ID will be voluntary. However, multiple exceptions are listed within the bill, leading some worry that a Digital ID could become compulsory in the future.

For example, “The ability for exemptions to be granted to online only service providers creates a hole in the “voluntary” scheme that a truck can and will be driven through,” said Libertarian Senate candidate for Victoria, Jordan Dittloff, in a social media post detailing his concerns.

In light of the doublespeak from the Australian Government about the “voluntary” scheme of mandated Covid vaccination, which was required as a condition of work, travel, and participation in society, anxieties about just how voluntary the Digital ID scheme will be are not without basis.

Finance Minister Senator Gallagher has said that the Australian Government’s Digital ID Framework will protect against data breaches and identity theft, which are ever-present risks in the digital environment.

Earlier this month, it was reported that more than one million Australian ID records had been exposed in an IT services provider data breach, affecting people who had visited ClubsNSW venues. The government is also investigating a data breach of personal and health information of an unknown number of Australians after a large-scale ransomware attack on former government contractor MediSecure, an online prescriptions service. One of the largest data breaches in Australia’s history occurred when Optus data was either hacked or leaked in 2022, affecting up to 10 million Australians.

Australian government databases are also vulnerable to data breaches. A spreadsheet released under Freedom of Information details 257 data breaches of federal government departments and agencies during the past four years, some of which had been concealed from the public. The majority (160) occurred due to human error, with a further 70 being attributed to malicious or criminal attacks and some to system failure.

Will the expanded Digital ID framework be impenetrable to human error, malicious attacks and system failure? Hopefully.

Edit 17 May: This article was updated to add information on government funding for the Digital ID expansion in the 2024-2025 budget, and on the MediSecure data breach.

To support my work, share, subscribe, and/or make a one-off contribution to DDU via my Kofi account. Thanks!

Follow me on X

Follow me on Instagram

Source

************

Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.