The Supreme Court of Arizona has allowed voter information packets to use the language “unborn human person” in describing abortion, overturning the Superior Court’s July ruling.
Associated Press reported that the ruling was made on Aug. 14. It concerned a voter information pamphlet describing Arizona’s abortion measure on the ballot for the November election, which would allow abortion until 24 weeks, and later if a “health professional” deemed it necessary for a woman’s “physical or mental health,” as CatholicVote previously reported.
Please follow LifeNews.com on Gab for the latest pro-life news and info, free from social media censorship.
On July 26, the Superior Court ruled in favor of Arizona for Abortion Access’s lawsuit against the Republican lawmakers who wrote the pamphlet. The abortion advocates argued that the term “unborn human person” was “politically charged,” but the Republican legislators’ attorney pointed out that Arizona’s current abortion laws use the term “unborn human person.”
Arizona’s Secretary of State office has stated that the ballot itself will not use the term “unborn human person,” AP reported.
This article was originally published by LifeNews. We only curate news from sources that align with the core values of our intended conservative audience. If you like the news you read here we encourage you to utilize the original sources for even more great news and opinions you can trust!
Comments