Put Your AD here!

Federal judge strikes down some of North Carolina’s abortion pill restrictions 

Federal judge strikes down some of North Carolina’s abortion pill restrictions 


This article was originally published on VOA News - America. You can read the original article HERE

A federal judge ruled Tuesday that some of North Carolina’s restrictions on the distribution of abortion pills contradicted federal law.

U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles blocked the state’s requirement that doctors provide and prescribe the abortion pill mifepristone in person, followed by a subsequent appointment.

The ruling came as the Supreme Court considers a case brought by anti-abortion-rights groups that could reinstate restrictions on the pill.

Eagles delivered a partial victory to a physician who performs abortions and sued state and local prosecutors and state health officials. Dr. Amy Bryant challenged state medication abortion regulations beyond those addressed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

The FDA approved mifepristone in 2000 to terminate a pregnancy in the first 10 weeks. The pills are used in more than half of all U.S. abortions, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research and policy organization focused on sexual and reproductive health that supports access to abortion.

Eagles said that North Carolina’s restrictions interfered with the goal of Congress to use federal regulators to ensure safe drug distribution.

A state law is preempted if it restricts the sale of an FDA-approved drug after the FDA “considered and rejected that restriction as unnecessary for safe use,” Eagles wrote.

Bryant said Wednesday that she was happy with Eagles' decision, which prevents restrictions "that second-guess or interfere with the FDA's expert judgment."

Eagles ruled that some of North Carolina’s restrictions could stay. She did not block restrictions such as the requirement of an in-person consultation 72 hours in advance, an in-person examination and an ultrasound before prescribing.

These requirements are “directed to broader health concerns and informed consent to the termination of a pregnancy,” Eagles wrote.

The ruling could be appealed. The judge asked the parties to propose written judgments and injunctions by May 21.

Some information for this report came from The Associated Press and Reuters.

This article was originally published by VOA News - America. We only curate news from sources that align with the core values of our intended conservative audience. If you like the news you read here we encourage you to utilize the original sources for even more great news and opinions you can trust!

Read Original Article HERE



YubNub Promo
Header Banner

Comments

  Contact Us
  • Postal Service
    YubNub Digital Media
    361 Patricia Drive
    New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168
  • E-mail
    admin@yubnub.digital
  Follow Us
  About

YubNub! It Means FREEDOM! The Freedom To Experience Your Daily News Intake Without All The Liberal Dribble And Leftist Lunacy!.


Our mission is to provide a healthy and uncensored news environment for conservative audiences that appreciate real, unfiltered news reporting. Our admin team has handpicked only the most reputable and reliable conservative sources that align with our core values.