By: Christina England, BA, Hons

In May, 2024, the UK media reported that, unless more pregnant women are vaccinated against whooping cough during pregnancy, more and more very young babies will die from the disease.

According to The Guardian, government expert Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, stated that the low up-take of the whooping cough vaccination among pregnant women, is putting very young babies at risk of contracting the disease, in the first few weeks of life. Whooping cough will kill more babies unless UK vaccination rates rise, says expert.

This information has been repeated throughout the media. However, according to my research, no one has explained to pregnant women who are considering taking up the vaccine, that there is no such thing as a single whooping cough vaccination and there never has been. If they accept, they will in fact be vaccinated with a 4 in 1 vaccination.

The vaccination that they will be offered is the Boosterix IPV vaccination, a vaccine for Tetanus, Diptheria, Pertussis (whooping cough) and Polio.

According to the NHS website Whooping cough vaccination in pregnancy:

“As there is no whooping cough-only vaccine, the vaccine you’ll be given also protects against polio, diphtheria and tetanus. The vaccine is called Boostrix IPV.

Boostrix IPV is similar to the 4-in-1 vaccine – the pre-school booster that’s routinely given to children before they start school.”

However, even this is about to change because the government have decided that as from 1^st July, 2024, they are no longer going to offer this vaccination to pregnant women. Instead they are going to offer them the three in one vaccination, ADACEL.

The question is, why?

In a letter Prenatal pertussis vaccine change from July 2024 letter outlining the change, they stated that:

“In October 2022, following a review of the latest evidence, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advised a preference for a non-IPV-containing pertussis vaccine in the maternal programme.

This followed studies measuring antibody levels in the infants of mothers who had received pertussis-containing vaccines (dTaP/IPV) in pregnancy. These studies showed lower antibody responses to polio (after completion of their primary infant schedule) compared to infants born to unvaccinated mothers, although all remained above the protective threshold.

To address this potential immunity gap caused by the blunting of the infant’s polio response to primary vaccines, a non-IPV-containing (Tdap) vaccine has now been procured. “(Own Emphasis)

In other words, the government are still in the process of studying the use of these vaccinations during pregnancy.

What is even more concerning is that according to the ADACEL information sheet, Adacel may lead to a higher percentage of miscarriage and babies born with serious birth defects.

Section 8.1 of the vaccination insert  states that:

“8.1 Pregnancy

Pregnancy Exposure Registry

There is a pregnancy exposure registry that monitors pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to Adacel during pregnancy. Women who receive Adacel during pregnancy are encouraged to contact directly, or have their healthcare professional contact, Sanofi Pasteur Inc. at 1-800-822-2463 (1-800-VACCINE) or online at Sanofi Pasteur Pregnancy Registries.”

It continues that:

“12 Risk Summary

All pregnancies have a risk of birth defect, loss or other adverse outcomes. In the US general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2% to 4% and 15% to 20%, respectively.

Available data suggest the rates of major birth defects and miscarriage in women who receive Adacel within 30 days prior to pregnancy or during pregnancy are consistent with estimated background rates. (See Human Data)”

As you can see, at first their information is not too concerning, however, despite this apparent reassurance, this may not in fact, be the case.

I studied the Human Data provided and although the figures appeared to suggest that the statistics of miscarriage and babies born with birth defects were relatively low, the sample group used was extremely small in comparison to the number of actual pregnancies.

In the section titled Human Data, it stated that:

“A retrospective passive surveillance study (NCT00258882) included women who received Adacel during pregnancy (n=225) and controls (n=675) matched by age and date of first positive pregnancy test. Of the 225 Adacel recipients, 39 women received Adacel within two weeks prior to the date of their last menstrual period (LMP), 110 were vaccinated during the 1st trimester (<12 weeks gestation), 33 during the 2nd trimester (12 to < 27 weeks gestation), 14 in 3rd trimester (11 from 27 to <36 weeks gestation and 3 from ≥36 weeks gestation), and 29 were unknown. There were 21 reports of spontaneous abortion (9.3%) and 15 congenital anomalies (6.7%) in the Adacel exposed group, and 102 spontaneous abortions (15%) and 57 congenital anomalies(8.4%) in the control group.

An assessment of data from the ongoing pregnancy registry included 1236 prospective reports of exposure to Adacel during pregnancy since 10 June 2005 through 16 October 2022. Among the 286 reports with known pregnancy outcomes, 118 women were exposed to Adacel in the first trimester with 1 congenital anomaly and 14 spontaneous abortions; 54 women were exposed to Adacel in the second trimester with one congenital anomaly; 114 women were exposed to Adacel in the third trimester with 2 congenital anomalies; 76 women were exposed to Adacel at an unknown trimester with 1 congenital anomaly.”

From the information provided, it appears that this is all one huge vaccination experiment and it is your unborn babies that they are experimenting on.

I feel that is worth mentioning that if the pregnant woman has either traveled abroad or has had an accident shortly before they became pregnant and subsequently received the tetanus vaccine, they may already be fully vaccinated.

This is because there is no such thing as a single tetanus vaccine and like the whooping cough vaccine, combination vaccinations are always used. See NHS website for details, Tetanus.

Worryingly, there is no apparent information as to whether or not another combination vaccine during pregnancy, could be dangerous for a growing fetus.

Sadly Nothing Has Changed

In the year 2015, I wrote an article titled: Is Your Unborn Baby Part of a Vaccine Experiment? Where I stated that:

“According to CDC paperwork, both the Tdap and the Dtap are vaccinations offered to pregnant women during pregnancy, supposedly to protect newborn infants from contracting pertussis (whooping cough) in the first few weeks of life.

However, despite recommending these vaccinations to all pregnant women, the CDC readily admits in their own documentation that neither vaccine had ever been tested during pregnancy for vaccine safety and that they have no idea whether the vaccines could harm a growing fetus.

In other words, by recommending these vaccinations to pregnant women, the CDC is fully prepared to use unborn babies as part of a massive vaccine experiment. What is even more worrying is the fact that, in doing this, they are potentially risking the lives of millions of unborn babies.”

Sadly, it appears that 9 years later lessons have not been learnt. These vaccinations continue to be promoted by our governments during pregnancy, as safe and effective vaccines to protect unborn babies from contracting whooping cough in the first few weeks of life.

The fact is that, as studies are still taking place, no one actually knows.

••••

TLB Note: Christina has been writing health related articles for The Liberty Beacon Project for over a decade CLICK HERE to read more of her great articles.

••••

About Christina England, BA Hons, Research Journalist and Author:

Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. She left school to work in a children’s library, specializing in storytelling and book buying. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980.

After taking an A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Support, Ms. England spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She gained a Higher National Diploma in Journalism and Media Studies in 2010 and in 2016 she gained a BA Hons degree in Literature and Humanities. She currently writes for The Liberty Beacon on immunization safety and efficacy.

Christina England has co-authored the following books – Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis – Are Parents Being Falsely Accused? with Dr. Harold Buttram and Vaccination Policy and the UK Government: The Untold Truth with Lucija Tomljenovic PhD, which are sold on Amazon. She also compiled the book Shattered Dreams: The HPV Vaccine Exposed. Her website is Parents and Carers Against Medical Injustice

Image Credit: Photos in Featured Image (top) –Pixabay License.

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.