The National Health Service (“NHS”) in the UK has been secretly sedating a 30-year-old man with Down’s syndrome, Adam, with powerful sedatives in his drinks (tea, orange juice, or Coke) to subdue him before administering the covid “vaccine” and booster injections against his mother’s will.

As Law or Fiction tweeted, “This is not only about Adam, it is about everyone’s ability to protect their loved ones” and shared the video below.

Adam is a pseudonym to protect his identity.  His mother, Catherine, has launched a legal battle to stop this practice, labelling it “forced vaccination” and “tantamount to assault” on her son’s human rights.

A Court of Protection order in 2021 allowed the covert sedation process, citing that it avoids the use of restraint or physical force and overcomes Adam’s needle phobia. The judge concluded that the vaccine was in Adam’s “best interests” due to his learning disabilities, autism, Down’s syndrome and obesity, placing him in a “clinical risk group.”

Catherine argues that the pandemic is over, and covid is now treated as a mild illness. She claims her son is being unfairly categorised as high-risk and that the sedation and vaccination process is an assault on his autonomy.

The family’s lawyer, Stephen Jackson of Jackson Osborne, joined Talk TV’s Mike Graham at the end of last month to discuss what had happened.

A court hearing has been scheduled for 14 November 2024.

Catherine has set up a crowdfunding campaign, ‘Stop Sedate-to-Vaccinate’, to raise funds for her legal fight against the NHS’s application for “forced medical treatments.”  Her Crowd Justice page states:

The authorities have three sets of lawyers set to undermine fundamental principles of informed consent, bodily autonomy and the family’s right to act in their loved one’s best interests. At the heart of this matter is a dangerous precedent: allowing government guidance to supersede the judgement of those who know and care for Adam most – his family.

Adam’s case is not an isolated one – today it is about covid-19 injections, but tomorrow it could involve any medical treatment mandated by government authorities. The court’s role must not be to impose blanket governmental policies over families, especially when they involve invasive procedures with significant risk, like sedating a vulnerable adult.

Please share Adam’s story widely and consider donating to the legal fund to ensure this case can proceed. Your support is vital in protecting Adam from further harm and ensuring that no one else is forced to endure such treatment.

You can support Catherine and Adam’s legal challenge on Crowd Justice HERE.

Further reading: