---

During an interview with James Delingpole, Sasha Latypova highlighted that it was known in the early 1900s that injecting small amounts of toxins such as bacteria or viruses, makes people and animals vulnerable to those toxins not immune to them. 

Additionally, vaccine components, such as egg proteins, prime our bodies to react badly when we encounter it in our environment. In other words, the vaccines are priming our bodies for allergic reactions; when the body’s immune system overreacts to a harmless substance, such as food, insect venom or environmental allergens

The admission of wide acceptance for this effect of vaccines was made when in 1913, Charles Richet won a Nobel Prize for discovering that vaccinating animals primes them for anaphylaxis, a severe and life-threatening allergic reaction.

“Richet … figured out how to poison everyone by sensitising them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment,” Latypova said. “It’s the most ingenious way of poisoning.”

Who is Charles Richet?

Charles Richet was a French physiologist (1850 -1935) who studied at the University of Paris and later became a professor at the Collège de France. Richet’s groundbreaking work on anaphylaxis, a life-threatening allergic reaction, earned him the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1913.

It is because of his Nobel Prize that we have proof that they have known vaccines cause anaphylaxis since 1902.  According to The Nobel Prize website,

Our immune system protects us from attacks by microorganisms and poisonous substances. After experiencing an attack, the immune system learns to defend itself against new attacks – we become immune. One of the ways this is used is with vaccinations, when a low dosage of an infectious substance provides immunity. Through studies involving dogs, Charles Richet demonstrated an opposite effect in 1902. After an initial low dose of a substance, a new dose some weeks later could produce a severe reaction. He called the phenomenon anaphylaxis.

And his biography on The Nobel Prize website confirms the same:

In 1913, [Richet] was awarded the Nobel Prize for his researches on anaphylaxis. He invented this word to designate the sensitivity developed by an organism after it had been given a parenteral injection of a colloid or protein substance or a toxin (1902).

Parenteral injection refers to the administration of a substance, such as a vaccine, directly into the body through a needle or syringe, bypassing the gastrointestinal tract and mucous membranes. This includes injections into muscles (intramuscular), under the skin (subcutaneous) or into the dermal layer (intradermal).

There was more to Richet than science.  In addition to his scientific work, Richet also explored paranormal and spiritualist phenomena, coining the term “ectoplasm.” And, Richet was a eugenicist.  According to Wikipedia (via EncycloReader):

[Richet] believed in the inferiority of black people, was a proponent of eugenics, and presided over the French Eugenics Society towards the end of his life.

Richet was a proponent of eugenics, advocating sterilisation and marriage prohibition for those with mental disabilities. He expressed his eugenist ideas in his 1919 book ‘La Sélection Humaine’. From 1920 to 1926 he presided over the French Eugenics Society.

Interview with Sasha Latypova

Alexandra ‘Sasha’ Latypova is a former big pharma industry executive. Her research has exposed how all covid countermeasures, including the biological warfare agents marketed as ‘covid-19 vaccines’ were created, produced and distributed in a covert military program, where the pharma manufacturers only worked as subcontractors.

At the end of September, James Delingpole interviewed Latypova.  Their discussion covered a variety of topics from Ancient Greece to chemtrails to vaccines. You can find an overview of the interview and the transcript on Latypova’s Substack HERE.

Sense Receptor tweeted a four-minute clip from her more than an hour-and-a-half-long interview adding the following comment.

THIS is why it’s IMPOSSIBLE to “vaccinate” against anything.  THIS is why “vaccines” are the PERFECT POISONS.  THIS is why eugenicists like Bill Gates love “vaccines.”

Retired pharmaceutical research and development executive Sasha Latypova describes for James Delingpole how “vaccines,” essentially, work in the exact opposite way as we’re told they do – meaning it’s literally impossible to make a vaccine that does anything but poison somebody.

While we’re told that “vaccines” work by giving us a small amount of a toxic substance – e.g. a bacteria or virus –  in turn allowing us to create immunity against future infections, what the injections actually do is make us vulnerable to said toxins. Furthermore, “vaccines” prime our bodies to react badly to *anything* that’s injected into us, including benign substances like milk or egg proteins. Hence the proliferation of allergies, such as allergies to milk, eggs, wheat, peanuts, etc.

Incredibly, Latypova explains how this has been known since 1913, when Charles Richet – a French physiologist and self-proclaimed eugenicist – won a Nobel Prize for figuring out that injecting animals with toxins primes them for harmful or deadly reactions if they encounter the same toxins in the environment, even in small amounts. He called these reactions “anaphylactic” reactions, but said that these reactions also included allergies.

After researching this topic and analysing Richet’s work, Latypova says she’s come to the conclusion that “everybody who is … closely familiar with this history and work cannot think that it’s possible to vaccinate.”

The pharmaceutical insider adds, “It’s impossible to vaccinate for anything. And Richet has demonstrated it conclusively and was given [the] Nobel Prize for it … because he figured out how to poison everyone by sensitising them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment.”

“It’s the most ingenious way of poisoning,” Latypova says.

“The eugenicists never went away. They all still think that way. They all still think that they should poison us and limit our reproduction because, you know, we’re polluting the earth now. We’re causing climate change,” Latypova adds.

“They’re brainwashing themselves and their followers into thinking that this is actually acceptable. It’s acceptable to poison people. It’s acceptable to sterilise people. It’s acceptable to lie to people because it’s for the ‘greater good’. So, what started with Richet continues today.”

Partial transcription of clip:

“One of the historical examples, Katherine [Watt] and I ran into, and this became a huge, epiphany for me is, Charles Richet, who was a French researcher in that time. So, he worked in [the] early 1900s. In 1913, he was given [the] Nobel Prize for this work, and he is credited with the work on anaphylaxis, although he wasn’t the only one, but so he received the Nobel Prize. And so that to me, you know, opened so much kind of. I was like, of course, you know, why didn’t I see this before? But basically, you know, when you look at this work and then when you look [at] what preceded and what went after, you kind of understand a few things.

“First of all, everybody who is, let’s say, closely familiar with this history and work cannot think that it’s possible to vaccinate. It’s impossible to vaccinate for anything. And Richet has demonstrated it conclusively and was given [the] Nobel Prize for it … because he figured out how to poison everyone by sensitising them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment. It’s the most ingenious way of poisoning.

“He was a committed eugenicist. And at that time, everyone should realise, eugenics was a fashionable societal attitude. So, all the well-to-do classes were subscribing to it. The good breeding was always, promoted. And, at the time, the sentiment was, ‘Well, how can we help the poor being less dirty and less numerous? Make them less numerous (aka kill them) because the sight of them is so offensive to us when we ride our horses through the park’ and then there’s like them, ‘What can we do about it?’ And what can we do about it became ‘let’s figure out how to control their, overbreeding because they tend to reproduce too much, and they tend to live in crowded conditions, and they tend to have poor hygiene and no sanitation’.

“So, instead of working on those issues [poverty, hygiene, sanitation], they will decide, ‘Oh, let’s vaccinate them’. And, the same thing continues with Bill Gates in Africa and India for the same reason. But all of these thoughts extended now to us, to normal people.

“Now all of the Globalists and these “elites,” I don’t call them elites, but they all think of us that way. That’s, you know, that’s what people need to understand. The eugenicists never went away. They all still think that way. They all still think that they should poison us and limit our reproduction because we’re polluting the earth now. We’re causing the climate change. Whatever those ideas are.  But they’re brainwashing themselves and their followers into thinking that this is actually acceptable. It’s acceptable to poison people. It’s acceptable to sterilise people. It’s acceptable to lie to people. Because it’s for the greater good. So, what started with Richet continues today.”

The clip above is taken from the interview below (beginning timestamp 8 mins) published by The Delingpod at the end of last month.  If you are unable to watch the video below on Rumble, you can watch it Odysee HERE.  You can follow and support James Delingpole HERE or on Substack HERE.