We are at the end of the plan, not the beginning, Dr. Meryl Nass informed the International Crisis Summit 6 in Tokyo at the end of last month.

Naming the key players involved in implementing the plan over the last 50 years, she provided an overview of the United Nations (“UN”) “sustainable development” plan and what its goals are.

The sixth International Crisis Summit (“ICS6”)was held in Tokyo, Japan, on 25 and 26 of September, at which James Corbett was one of the speakers.  Dr. Meryl Nass also delivered a lecture during the event.

For an overview of the event, you can read an article published by Dr. Byram Bridle before the event took place HERE and from a personal perspective, you can read Dr. Jessica Rose’s article published after the event HERE.  You can watch Dr. William Makis’ 7-minute speech HERE and 12-minute presentation HERE with the accompanying slides HERE.  You can also watch The Corbett Report on ICS6 HERE.

In the video below, James Corbett breaks down Dr. Nass’ presentation at the Tokyo International Crisis Summit. He provides context and further reading about the cadre of elitists who are attempting to take control of the planet and its resources. 

If you are unable to watch the video above on Rumble, you can watch it on other platforms as noted on The Corbett Report’s website HERE.  Under the video embedded on The Corbett Report’s webpage, you will also see the show notes, with hyperlinks, that accompany it.

In the following, we only highlight a few points that Dr. Nass made in her presentation; it is by no means an attempt to summarise her entire presentation.

For the first few minutes, Corbett introduces and then shares Dr. Nass’ ICS6 lecture during which she discussed the Globalist agenda and the broader UN umbrella under which it is operating.  She provides some of the names and some of the facts, dates, details and source documents.  You can find a PDF copy of the slides that Dr. Nass used during her presentation HERE.

We aren’t at the beginning of something; we are at the end of something, Dr. Nass said.  “There’s been a plan in place for a minimum of 50 years.”

The culmination of this plan was the worldwide centralisation of power, global governance and the appropriation of all our resources by a small group of wealthy people. Over 50 years, this plan has been moving us to where we are today in terms of climate, 15-minute cities, population control, pandemics, vaccines etc.

As she began researching, it became apparent that “Conferences and treaties conducted by the UN and its agencies were central to this programme,” she said.  These include the Millennium Development Goals (2000), Sustainable Development Goals (2015), Agenda 2030 (2015) and Agenda 2050.

Dr. Nass named a few of the key people who have been and are involved in pushing this plan forward:

• Gro Harlem Brundtland, three-time Norwegian Prime Minister who was WHO Director-General from 1998 to 2003. She chaired the World Commission on Environment and Development which presented the Brundtland Report on “sustainable development.”
• Bill Gates
• Henry Kissinger, a deep politician, former US Secretary of State and National Security Advisor.
• Ursula von der Leyen, the current President of the European Commission. She was Minister of Defence in the German Government from 2013 to 2019.
• Anthony Fauci, is a US physician, immunologist and US Deep state actor.
• Maurice Strong, a Canadian deep state actor who was a protege of the Rockefeller family from the 1950s onward. An oil and mineral businessman cum diplomat, he was a UN Under-Secretary-General. “He almost single-handedly carried this [Globalist plan] narrative along for 40 years and dragged the planet with him,” Dr, Nass said.
• Jeremy Farrar, a medical researcher, formerly chair of the Wellcome Trust and from 2023 took up the position of Chief Scientist at the World Health Organisation.

As Dr. Nass highlighted, Maurice Strong was the secretary general of the UN Conference on the Human Environment held in Stockholm, Sweden, in 1972.  It was the first environmental conference of the UN, Dr. Nass said. With this first conference, “[Strong] was interested in changing habitats, changing our cities and towns [pre-cursor to 15-minute cities], making sure countries who took money and help had to go along with the programme [loss of sovereignty], and family planning (population control),” Dr. Nass said.

In 1975, Strong founded the UN Environment Programme (“UNEP”).  He then moved on to become a member of and play a significant role in the Brundtland Commission, also known as the World Commission on Environment and Development (“WCED”). The Brundtland Commission was a UN sub-organisation established in 1983 which aimed to unite countries in pursuit of “sustainable development,” a concept introduced in its 1987 report, ‘Our Common Future’. 

Note from The Exposé:  What does the term “sustainable development” mean?  Most people would assume it means matching man’s development of the world around us to sustain the Earth’s climate, environment or biodiversity at current levels.  While it could be loosely used to incorporate this concept by some, it actually means sustainable levels of the human population as determined and measured by the UN’s metrics. 

For example, if the UN decided that a key metric is that the birth rate should be no more than 2.1 children per woman, then this, according to the UN, is the metric governments should aim for, if not outright adhere to, to sustain their country’s population level, the number of people as dictated by the UN.

This concept of “development” is clearly demonstrated in an article written by Claire Melamed and published in The Guardian in 2014 titled ‘Development data: how accurate are the figures?’.  At the time, Malamed was the head of the growth and equity programme for the British think tank Overseas Development Institute, which according to one of the UN agencies is a “leading global, independent think tank on international development and humanitarian issues.”

In short, “sustainable development” means population control.

Related: Conspiracy theorists, you were right: The climate change agenda is the depopulation agenda, even though no one knows what the global population is

Strong was again the Secretary General of the UN’s Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, the world’s environment conference.  “This time, [Stong’s efforts] were much more successful,” Dr. Nass said having earlier noted that the 1972 Conference on the Human Environment didn’t convince many about taking up the agenda.

Twenty years later, Strong was still senior advisor to the next Secretary General of the UN Conference on Sustainable Development held in Brazil in 2012.  He was also a board member of the World Economic Forum, Under Secretary General of the UN, and a special or senior advisor to the UN Secretary-General and President of the World Bank.

However, “sustainable development,” population control under the guise of “climate change” is only part of the plan.  So, what are the other aims of the plan Strong and his collaborators have been working on all these years to implement?

In 1974, 51 years ago, Richard Gardner told us what the plan was, Dr. Nass said.  In an article titled ‘The Hard Road to New World Order’ written for the Council on Foreign Relations (“CFR”), in addition to a section on “the population problem” and achieving a “zero population growth by a specific target date” he wrote:

The hopeful aspect of the present situation is that even as nations resist appeals for “world government” and “the surrender of sovereignty,” technological, economic and political interests are forcing them to establish more and more far-reaching arrangements to manage their mutual interdependence.

Among other things, we will be seeking new rules in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade to cover a whole range of hitherto unregulated nontariff barriers. These will subject countries to an unprecedented degree of international surveillance over up to now sacrosanct “domestic” policies, such as farm price supports, subsidies, and government procurement practices that have transnational effects.

The next few years should see a continued strengthening of the new global and regional agencies charged with protecting the world’s environment … At the same time, international agencies will be given broader powers to promulgate and revise standards limiting air and ocean pollution.

The Hard Road to World Order, Richard N. Gardner, Foreign Affairs, April 1974

For anyone who finds it difficult to believe there is a plan, long in the making, being rolled out globally, Gardner’s article is a must-read from start to finish, and then remind yourself it was published in 1974.