This article was originally published on Twitchy - Media. You can read the original article HERE
The post-VP debate spin continues in the media, and one of the unintentionally funniest is in a body language piece from Politico Mag.
At issue were some of the expressions on Tim Walz's face last night, namely about his occasionally bugged-out eyes.
Advertisement
Were those expressions because Walz got busted for lying about having been in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square massacre? Well, according to the Politico story, Walz's "look" goes back many, many more years than that -- thousands even:
This debate analysis from Politico 😂 pic.twitter.com/sLAA0MQrcT
— Joel Berry (@JoelWBerry) October 2, 2024
It's real, and it's spectacular...
👀https://t.co/phqfzHWyfb pic.twitter.com/Id14AQdNgG
— Jerry Dunleavy IV 🇺🇸 (@JerryDunleavy) October 2, 2024
Yes, it's real, and I can't believe it lol https://t.co/BrViGujcjV
— Joel Berry (@JoelWBerry) October 2, 2024
This is like the political journalism of a Geico commercial: "Democrat Vice Presidenting: So Simple a Caveman Could Do It."
When Walz felt especially passionate about something, he’d open his eyes wide as saucers. Eye-popping can sometimes be a sign of surprise, but for Walz, it simply revealed his emotional intensity — like this moment during an exchange about abortion. The orbicularis oculi muscle, working in concert with the corrugator and frontalis muscles, contract to raise the eyebrows — a dynamic and emphatic facial motion that grabbed the viewer’s attention. Early humans would have made such facial gestures to communicate strong emotions, like “danger is close.” For Walz, it gave extra weight to his feelings and held our gaze.
Now imagine that same section of the story if Vance was the one doing the eye-popping expressions.
You know this debate was bad for @Tim_Walz when this is the best cover @politico can provide… https://t.co/HuxncgZiax
— Preya Samsundar (@psamsundar) October 2, 2024
Media really scraping the bottom of the barrel to try to make it sound like Walz performed well in the VP debate. https://t.co/HAwbl222YQ
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) October 2, 2024
Amazing journalisming!
So… they just called Walz a wild-eyed Neanderthal. Amazing. 😂
— Fuzzy Chimp 🇺🇸🍌 (@fuzzychimpcom) October 2, 2024
😂🤣... 😳 So dumb, https://t.co/kai0Cxx44X
— Tammy Bruce (@HeyTammyBruce) October 2, 2024
And then some.
***
Related:
Can You Spot the Subtle Differences Between Politico's Storm Headlines (Trump vs. Biden-Harris)
This article was originally published by Twitchy - Media. We only curate news from sources that align with the core values of our intended conservative audience. If you like the news you read here we encourage you to utilize the original sources for even more great news and opinions you can trust!
Comments