Hillary Clinton doesn’t know how to take a hint and fade away from the political scene.

She’s still furious that she lost the 2016 election to Donald Trump.

And Hillary Clinton got the worst news imaginable after she picked this fight with Donald Trump.

Hillary Clinton accuses Donald Trump of election interference in 2016

Former First Lady and two-time failed Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has never gotten over her 2016 loss to former President Donald Trump.

She thought she was entitled to the Presidency and didn’t even bother to visit crucial battleground states, like Wisconsin, during her campaign.

After Trump’s win, she claimed without evidence that the election was stolen from her because of so-called “Russian collusion” and interference.

Soros-backed Manhattan Democrat District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s sham witch hunt against Trump was an opportunity for Clinton to concoct another excuse for why she lost in 2016.

Bragg has accused Trump of somehow “interfering” in the 2016 election by having his former Attorney, Michael Cohen, negotiate the terms of a nondisclosure agreement with porn star Stormy Daniels in order to keep her from allegedly revealing a supposed affair the two had, and marking his reimbursement and payment to Cohen for his services as “legal services” in financial documents.

In an appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Clinton went on a tirade about the Manhattan Democrat District Attorney’s witch hunt against Trump.

She claimed that the case was about so-called “election interference,” implying that if voters had known about Trump’s alleged bookkeeping error, she would be in the White House.

The two-time failed Presidential candidate continues to relitigate the election.

But she didn’t mention one important detail about her historic defeat.

Law professor slams Clinton for her outrageous hypocrisy

George Washington University Law School professor and constitutional law expert Jonathan Turley mocked Clinton’s claims of election interference by pointing out that her campaign literally funded the thoroughly debunked Steele Dossier, which launched the fraudulent “Russian collusion” hoax, during an appearance on Fox News.

“They are saying you rigged an election or a race that was already run, that’s what doesn’t make sense to us,” Turley said. “The hilarious aspect of that earlier clip with Hillary Clinton is that she actually makes the case for Trump, because when she says ‘how dare you keep information from the public,’ the Clinton campaign lied to the media about funding the Steele dossier.”

Another important detail in the case is the fact that Trump’s alleged accounting error happened after the 2016 election had already taken place.

“How did they hide it?” Turley asked. “They said it was legal expenses with Marc Elias. And when they were facing a fine, they litigated that and said no, it really is a legal expense. So her campaign did exactly what she is suggesting here, but they did it before the election.”

Clinton shamelessly accused Trump of doing what her 2016 campaign was caught red-handed doing.

Clinton’s campaign and the Democrat National Committee were fined $8,000 and $105,000, respectively, for improperly recording their funding of the Steele Dossier on federal campaign finance forms in order to hide the fact that they started the propaganda campaign in the first place.

“What Trump is being accused of is giving the wrong notation, which he may not have had anything to do with, after the election was over that somehow affected the election,” Turley said. “The fact that Judge Juan Merchan has allowed this case to go forward on these conflicted elements of the theory is one of the biggest complaints I have against him, that most judges, I think, would have approached this case very differently and many would not have had this case go to trial.”

Hillary Clinton’s smear against Donald Trump was a classic case of projection.